When the police broke into my home to assist social services in the kidnap of my newborn son, that I recorded and led to Munby's landmark ruling (J a baby). One of the police quoted the Nuremberg Defense "I'm Just following orders".. History is repeating. Within a few hours of the kidnap I'd asked local police to investigate how the order was obtained, because a child needs to be in imminent danger for an EPO to be obtained legally, and i have recordings of meetings where the SS (social services) clearly say that we are not a danger to our children. The local police got back to me and confirmed that a serious crime had been committed against my family, then he went on to say that all of his colleagues at the main station wanted to take action against the criminals but they'd been ordered by the criminals to stand down or lose their jobs and pensions. How can victims of this legalised child trafficking paedophile ring get any justice, when the (Nazis) criminals are in charge?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/11657472/A-rising-tide-of-anger-across-Europe-at-Nazi-social-workers.html
"Here is a flavour of Linda Ärlig’s findings with regard to persecution strategies used by Social Services." The Swedish academic categorises the strategies in these terms:
The authority knows best
Blackening the names of the parents
Making children and parents to appear in need of care
Pushing through and sticking to decisions that have been made
Disregarding laws and regulations
Destroying relations of importance to the family
Influencing the reader
Disregarding elementary aspects of objectivity
http://www.inquisition21.com/index.php?module=pagemaster&PAGE_user_op=view_page&PAGE_id=353
Many of these strategies apply to the Named Person scheme in Scotland .
The authority knows best
Simply by having Named Persons in charge of the wellbeing of each child, the law is saying that state agents know better than parents.
Blackening the names of the parents
By making the Named Person the receptor of all data about a child and its family, third party information based on little more than feelings and intuitions is made available.
Making children and parents appear in need of care
It is called early intervention, getting `in there` before a crisis happens. Who says a crises is going to happen unless the state intervenes? They do.
Pushing through and sticking to decisions that have been made
It is a worrying sign of the state of democracy in Scotland when a group of concerned citizens have to take the Scottish Government to court to contest the Named Person scheme when many parents in Scotland are not fully aware of its implications. SEE HERE As for political opposition to the legislation, with a few exceptions, it hardly exists.
Disregarding laws and regulations
The Scottish Government has disregarded Article 8 of the ECHR: `The right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence.` Data protection law might as well not exist.
Destroying relations of importance to the family
The Named Person gets between parents and children and undermines that essential bond.
Influencing the reader
This can be interpreted as influencing reports or influencing people`s perceptions. An event at Hampden Park, June 20, will be rewarding parents for attending with a 25 pound gift voucher, out of public funds. There, they will receive the Government approved version of the Named Person scheme.
Disregarding elementary aspects of objectivity
Here is one example:
"Realising Ambition is a UK-wide £25m Big Lottery Fund programme replicating 25 interventions aimed at preventing children and young people from entering the criminal justice system. Launched in 2012, the five year programme is providing grant funding and specialist support to 22 organisations to refine and build the evidence base of their interventions."
"Realising Ambition is a programme of national and international significance. During the course of the programme the delivery organisations will work with over 130,000 children and young people."
What you have here is policy-based evidence, not evidence-based policy. They have got it back to front.
I have seen it often reported that the Named Person scheme is a well meaning piece of legislation even though it may have over-stretched itself somewhat . I have never believed that. These people know exactly what they are doing. They are building a system which will make it easier to remove children from their families. Under that threat parents will have to jump through hoops to keep their children.
No comments:
Post a Comment